Risk v Reward

An elite softball player must demonstrate superior explosive power by producing force in a very short period of time (e.g. hitting, sprinting for a ball in the outfield). In order for force production to be efficient and maximized, the underlying movements must also be efficient.    We often use the term “elite mover” to describe an athlete capable of this combination.

While many athletes possess natural athleticism thanks to their parents, athleticism does not always translate into the characteristic of an elite mover. Becoming an elite mover means unlocking the body’s ability to (1) stabilize (2) mobilize and (3) accelerate/ decelerate the body in both high and low velocity conditions. At S2 Breakthrough, our athletes work their way through our level system based off their performance in our Threshold Assessment. Power focus in training is not implemented until an athlete is in our top level (4), ensuring she has mastered the foundations first.

Strength coaches often attempt to train power movements through Olympic lift variations (snatches, clean and jerks, power cleans, etc.) and plyometric box exercises. When programmed appropriately and thoroughly progressed, these activities can be effective for their purpose. If the goal, however, is to mitigate risk of injury, then we must consider the risk versus reward of these types of lifts and exercises. Snatches, cleans, box jumps, etc. require highly coordinated movements and with that comes great responsibility for both the coach and athlete. If these movements are performed without proper form and/or excessive load, the door to compensation opens and the risk for future injury increases.

When it comes to long-term athletic development in softball, we must take a step back and analyze the tools we are handing our athletes to be successful. When developing training plans for our athletes, I am motivated by exercises that are both effective and practical, weighing the risk versus reward carefully. For example, all of the following exercises create the same reward: improving force production and explosiveness through the hips. The risks of each should be weighed against the reward based on the maturity level and training age of the athlete:

Exercise Risk Reward
Box Jump Falling off box

Inappropriate box height

Poor landing mechanics

Explosiveness / Force Production: Hips
Snatches Improper pull mechanics Explosiveness/ Force Production: Hips
Hang Cleans “The catch” – wrist mobility Explosiveness / Force Production: Hips
Barbell Reverse Lunge Loss of balance Explosiveness/ Force Production: Hips
Body Weight (or weighted) Split Squat Jumps Loss of balance

Poor landing mechanics

Explosiveness /Force Production: Hips

My Journey From Pitching Lessons to Player Development: Why Growing as a Coach Matters Too

I have loved pitching all of my life. As a young athlete, it taught me to be a leader and a warrior, and now as a coach, wife, mother, business owner, not a day goes by that I’m not grateful for how the circle prepared me for life.
When I decided to follow my heart about 10 years ago and pursue coaching as a full time career, I imagined spending my days with young pitchers, showing them all the ways the circle could empower them as well. After opening S2 Breakthrough my work very much modeled what I expected, but as time went on, I realized that I was simply feeding into a broken system.
It began with the realization that coaching my pitchers in a traditional lesson format felt like I was micro-managing their performance. They were relying on me and my cues to perform. Parents loved my energetic, passionate approach but to me, something was missing – the passion and energy from the athletes. When I would go to games to watch some of my pitchers compete, they often looked like a very different version of the pitcher I knew in “lessons”. It became obvious to me that I had built a setup that prompted pitching as instant progress and the need for constant short-term success. When my pitchers were not experiencing that in competition, they were lost.
What I loved about my own journey as a pitcher was that it was just that – a journey. For as many highs as I experienced, I felt just as many lows. I had coaches and mentors, of course, but what the circle really taught me was that when you’re out there in competition, you rely on your belief in yourself, your experiences with both failure and success, and the resilience you progressively built in order to climb your way to the top.
The first major change I made to my lesson format was to move from individual to small group sessions. I thought that would teach my athletes how to accept ownership and accountability over their training and ultimately their journey as a pitcher. I felt like I was providing my athletes with a better way to train but something was still missing. It wasn’t the best. I knew I was falling short, but didn’t really understand why.
I was watching my business partner Krista evolve as a hitting coach. As MLB began investing in tech and research, hitting began to progress and softball, of course, benefited from that trickle down effect. Around the same time, we had our first clinic and presentation with Austin Wasserman of High Level Throwing. I quickly noticed a trend. Both Austin and Krista were looking at throwing/hitting in a very similar manner. It seemed obvious that teaching pitching should follow the same principles of human movement and energy transfer, but it wasn’t. Instead, we were passing on the same drills and workouts we had taught/been taught for decades.
I wanted to seek more knowledge, better knowledge about how to train pitchers. I started attending high level conferences with high level coaches/speakers and to be perfectly honest, it all felt stagnant. The talks surrounding training mimicked exactly what I was doing at S2, which mimicked exactly what I did as a pitcher 20 years ago. This couldn’t be right. I started to question things like overhand throwing as a sufficient warm-up, sprinting while pitching as a means to promote better mechanics, and why pitch counts were never discussed in softball.
This led me to start trying different approaches at S2 Breakthrough. It had become a mini lab for me. We started with prioritizing movement. Dynamic warm-ups, arm care and movement prep kicked off every training session. I chose movements that paralleled the pitching motion and began to talk to my athletes about the connection between the two. I felt like I was moving in the right direction with training but as soon as pitchers would begin pitching, I was still modeling what I had always done – the same drills, the same cues. So I started to question myself. How do I actually know that this stuff works? How do I know if these drills are effective or even correct?
About a year and a half ago Krista and I started to invest in some tech. We wanted data to challenge us and change the way we trained, coached and thought. And so the journey began.
S2 Breakthrough now houses a platform to build great movers in order to build great pitchers. Movement work doesn’t just supplement training, movement and strength work are the training. We now understand that pitching is just a sequence of highly coordinated movements. We’ve pulled those movements apart into their fundamental pieces and attack our athletes’ inefficiencies through individualized training. This is player development. You cannot pitch if you cannot move well, and you cannot maximize movement capability if you’re never assessed. To make your pitchers great, start from the bottom and build. Simply forcing pitchers into positions and drills they cannot manage is not the answer. Encourage the journey, not instant success or a secret formula. Be willing to change how you see and do things. It’s not about ego or being “right”. It’s about seeking more for our athletes and for the game we all love so much.